Talk It Out

Discuss the issues of today and tomorrow

Trust us - its not like we are after higher profits

It's not like we have enough misleading Howard government advertisements clogging up our TV screens, a coalition of business groups have now released their own "independent" advertisement in support of Howard government WorkChoices laws (designed by Liberal party pollsters, no doubt for maximum independence from the government!). If anyone was in any doubt about whom the IR laws were designed to benefit, that doubt should have been dispelled by the business groups spending millions on these advertisements. But lets take a look at the ad:

The ad starts with telling us that "it hasn't been easy, but over the last two decades Australia has undergone workplace reform". Well, that's interesting, lets stop right there. Over the last two decades? So a decade before the Howard government the then Labor governments were changing and reforming our IR system to make sure it kept up with the times. But that's not what these business groups want - they don't just want progress, they want the extremes of Howard government's IR agenda.

Then we have those great slogans of all WorkChoices propaganda "Choice", "Flexibility" and "Productivity". Yes, the business groups would like the choice and flexibility it gives the employers to cut their employees' conditions, wages and protections and to force more flexibility out of employees. There are no real choices or flexibilities for the employees, but who cares about the workers, right? The ad then heads into even murkier waters. "Australia's economy has grown by nearly 4%" it boasts - quoting March '07 quarter ABS figures. This is accompanied by a graph showing the rate of growth in seasonally-adjusted GDP increasing from zero to 4% (presumably in response to WorkChoices legislation):

workchoices ad screenshot

The representation in the graph is blatantly misleading. Needless to say, before the introduction of WorkChoices, GDP growth was nowhere near zero. Secondly, the ad suggests that there is some sort of a causal relationship between WorkChoices and 3.8% annual increase in the GDP evident from ABS figures. No such relationship has been established. Further, GDP growth has on several occasions exceeded the 3.8% in the last decade, see the graph below:

Australia economic growth chart

The rate of GDP growth goes up and down in cycles (the average over the 20th century is about 3.5%). To implicitly suggest that the current rate of growth is unusually high or that it is causally related to WorkChoices is to engage in deception. 

The subsequent representations that "since the introduction of workplace reforms" new jobs have been created, exports increased and higher dividends have been paid to shareholders are similarly misleading because they suggest a causal relationship between WorkChoices and any economic events since their introduction. The suggestion is utter nonsense. For example, employment figures have been increasing steadily for more than a decade before the introduction of WorkChoices. Similarly, export growth figures are not unusual and the sector is much more likely to be affected by free trade agreements that have been signed, international price and currency fluctuations and international economies than WorkChoices. The suggestion of a link between the two is simply mischievous. The same reasoning applies to dividends to shareholders. Incidentally - if there is a link between dividends and WorkChoices then perhaps we should blame the recent sharemarket collapse on WorkChoices!

Having finished with the blatantly misleading praising of WorkChoices the big business advertisement then descends into ridiculous warnings of the end of the world if WorkChoices laws are abandoned. There is the very subtle "gone out of business because of union bosses" sign painted over a window (gone out of business because of corporate fraud or mismanagement would be a much more realistic sign) followed by a statement that to undo WorkChoices is like trying to unscramble an egg (hmm, WorkChoices = scrambled eggs, nice analogy!).

And then we have the best part - a doom and gloom scenario based on "independent" research. The so-called independent research report that is pictured was produced by Econtech - a company that has close affiliations with the Howard government and the report was in fact commissioned by ACCI for the purposes of this ad, based on rigged assumptions designed to create the outcomes that ACCI wanted.

This blatantly misleading ad concludes with a plea to "keep the workplace reform". Trust us - we the big business know whats best for you. OK, so our member companies maybe the ones that are slashing your conditions and reducing your take home pay, but its not like we are just interested in our profits and our executive bonuses. OK, so we just released a deceptive advertisement, but its for your own good you know, how else are we supposed to get you plebs to see the benefits of being deprived of your rights? Just trust us, ok?

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes

August 12th, 2007 Posted by Unsilenced | Industrial relations, Political advertising, Business groups | 9 comments

9 Comments to “Trust us - its not like we are after higher profits”

  1. AvatarCaney
    1

    “gone out of business because of union bosses”

    “pay and conditions stolen from workers because of business union bosses”

  2. AvatarStan Howard
    2

    Note that “Workplace Reform” has no relationship to “WorkChoices” - the figures the big business ads quote apparently mean rolling back reform prior to the Keating 1992 & 1993 reform acts - i.e. before we had any enterprise bargaining or unfair dismissal laws.

    WorkChoices obviously stinks so badly that they can’t do a legitimate comparison to the Rudd Labor Party policies.

    Just downright dishonest - ACCI should WorkChoice Peter Hendy after the election.

  3. Pingback Pingback:
    3
    Rank and Vile » Blog Archive » Standard of living and workplace reform - please explain

    […] Talk it out has a great post about the dishonesty of the data presented in those ads. But I would like to invite anyone out there who knows more about the link between working conditions and standards of living whether there is another dishonest aspect. […]

  4. Avatarsawdustmick
    4

    Correct me if I am wrong but the so-called independent report from Econtech in the add was dated 1993.

  5. AvatarUnsilenced
    5
    Author Comment

    Sawdustmick, I think the report is titled “The economic effects of industrial relations reform since 1993″ and is dated July 2007.

  6. AvatarUnsilenced
    6
    Author Comment

    Stan Howard - yep, you are absolutely right. The report was based on deliberately false assumptions - Econtech were asked to compare the situation now to pre-1993 position. Of course no one was talking about returning to pre-1993 era, just abolishing WorkChoices.

    I guess they decided that the only way to defend the indefensible is to lie through their teeth.

  7. AvatarJacques Chester
    7

    The best part of the whole ad is the Evil Mood Music at the end. Dunh dunh daaaaa!

  8. AvatarUnsilenced
    8
    Author Comment

    LOL!

  9. Pingback Pingback:
    9
    Coke is a health drink | Talk It Out

    […] We have laws to protect us from blatantly false advertising for products. But nothing protects us from misleading political advertising. One might think that being misled into electing a government whose policies will deprive your kids of security and fairness in the workplace is at least as harmful as your kids drinking too much Coke. But of course neither political party is anxious to ensure that political advertising (whether via TV ads or sending dodgy letters attacking the Greens) is accurate or at least not blatantly misleading.  And the Libs are certainly not interested in stopping the "union of bosses" aka the big business coalition from airing misleading ads. […]

Leave a comment